welcome: please sign in

Diff for "GenderNeutralLanguage"

Differences between revisions 13 and 14
Revision 13 as of 2006-08-07 19:18:41
Size: 3803
Editor: JeremyPenner
Comment:
Revision 14 as of 2006-08-07 19:55:24
Size: 2973
Editor: mail
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 13: Line 13:
Although some criticize the use of "they" in a singular context, others think that such criticisms are merely attemps at an elitist monopoly on what "proper" grammar is. It should also be noted that some proponents of this form of gender-neutral language claim that such gender-neutral pronouns have a history that predates even the women's liberation movement by centuries (see [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gender_neutral_language]). They finally note that those who try to claim that one particular use of a language is the only "reasonable" one are perhaps trying to hide certain ideologies or structures of power in society, either consciously or unconsciously.
 * Dude, this isn't wikipedia. NPOV is a terrible way to have an argument. What's more, stopping just short of telling people who disagree with you that they're fascists is not a good way to get them to change their minds. That said, I think gender-neutral language is a fine thing to strive for, and "they" is way more palatable than alternatives like "[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ze_%28pronoun%29 ze]" or "he or she".
 * [took out text that referred to old text that was removed] ... that said, I think gender-neutral language is a fine thing to strive for, and "they" is way more palatable than alternatives like "[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ze_%28pronoun%29 ze]" or "he or she".

This page should not be construed as an "official HCoop policy or position," since there is strong disagreement among the members on what is appropriate. A Wikipedia page does not a binding standard make! At best, this page acknowledges an issue that we may or may not produce an official HCoop policy on in the future.

1. Gender-Neutral Language

For many in the Cooperative, language is not merely a tool that we use, but one which reproduces the structures of power in our society. Gender inequality, as one of these social forms of power, is also reproduced through language. Because of this, many members of the Cooperative feel strongly that we consider carefully how gender bias creeps into our everyday languages, including the communication between members of the Cooperative and externally.

1.1. Tips on Writing in a Gender-Neutral Style

Generally, many of the arguments for gender-neutral language have led those who advocate its use to prefer gender-neutral instead of gender-specific pronouns when discussing a person whose gender is unknown, when the person prefers to not categorize themself as belonging to a specific gender, or when a party is of mixed gender. See the wikipedia article below for more information.

For example, in the English language, many who try to write in a gender-neutral manner prefer the use of "their" instead of "his" or "her".

  • [took out text that referred to old text that was removed] ... that said, I think gender-neutral language is a fine thing to strive for, and "they" is way more palatable than alternatives like "[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ze_%28pronoun%29 ze]" or "he or she".

    Clinton, do you have any examples of alternating pronouns every paragraph? Because that sounds like it would be extremely difficult to read. -- JeremyPenner

  • Using 'their' is incorrect. 'He' is the unspecified gender pronoun in English. Alternating between male and female pronouns every paragraph is reasonable if one wishes, but using they/their is a sin against the English language. -- ClintonEbadi

    • I disagree, the English language has rare few "sins." Singular "their," while prescriptively "wrong," has a very long and wide history in the language. I don't care to write an HCoop style manual now, and we may or may not want this usage in "HCoop literature," but everyone is entitled to their opinion and it is more nuanced than simply "wrong." (see, e.g. [http://www.crossmyt.com/hc/linghebr/austheir.html]) It can be very difficult or awkward to write "correct" and concise documentation in standard English that is simultaneously gender-neutral. --NathanKennedy

GenderNeutralLanguage (last edited 2013-01-17 07:16:33 by RobinTempleton)