welcome: please sign in

Diff for "OurHistory/ColocationProvidersEvaluation"

Differences between revisions 20 and 34 (spanning 14 versions)
Revision 20 as of 2006-04-19 00:34:06
Size: 5238
Comment: Added Switch and Data information
Revision 34 as of 2008-07-07 04:27:59
Size: 6273
Editor: localhost
Comment: converted to 1.6 markup
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 1: Line 1:
## page was renamed from ColocationProvidersEvaluation
Line 2: Line 3:
Below are the service providers that Hcoop, Inc. is considering for our future hosting needs, along with available information about pricing and infrastructure. Some providers that are no longer being considered for our hosting needs are listed at the page PreviouslyConsideredColocationProviders.
Line 3: Line 5:
See the responses from various providers to our ColocationQuoteRequest. Where available, their actual responses are provided as attached PDF files. == Peer 1 ==
http://www.peer1.net
Line 5: Line 8:
== GAIA Host == Peer 1 offers a quarter cabinet for 10U. A fast ethernet port with a 5MB/s connection is provided. Monthly costs for the space will be $750, and there would be a $400 initial charge for installation of a rack/cabinet. A 10 amp circuit is provided.
Line 7: Line 10:
[http://www.gaiahost.coop/] Peer 1 does not sell hardware.
Line 9: Line 12:
GAIA contacted us after receiving the quote request, but it has taken them more than a week to give us a follow-up quote. So far, they are the only provider in the list who is willing to sell us hardware. However, it seems that they would be putting it in a data center like one of the larger providers that are being considered below, such as He.net or Peer 1. Their response to our request as a PDF: [[attachment:Peer1.QuarterCab.Proposal.pdf]]
Line 11: Line 14:
 Did they ever give a followup quote? They obviously have to give us a better deal on bandwidth than offered on their website, otherwise they cannot be considered. If they can offer us good value, I think we should consider giving them a chance for at least an intermediate expansion, but if they are charging too much or simply too flaky as they have seemed in the past, then they can't be in the running. NathanKennedy

 On April 17, 2006 I still have not received a followup quote. I also don't know where their facilities are located... I am guessing something less impressive that he.net or Peer 1's data centers. If this is the case I would think that our members could save time and money by doing the legwork of server installation and dealing with the colocation providers ourselves, rather than going through GAIA. Of course, it is always nice to do work with other cooperatives if we have a sound reason to do so. JustinLeitgeb
 . It looks pretty clear that Peer1 is by far the highest quality provider on our list, and I was impressed by their letter and quote. The bar to entry is also high; $750 a month and 10U to utilize. On the other hand it is tempting; PLENTY of room for growth probably for years to come, a first-class network (450 direct tier one peers, 1-ms maximum intercity latency, 4-ms maximum intercity latency delivery to any tier one peer). We would NOT be having the kind of network issues we were plagued with in the past with Interserver. It is definitely a good value, but it an awfully big step up from where we are now--we don't want to waste member resources if the cabinet went vastly underutilized for long periods of time; we would need a major membership drive or some really big clients. Another advantage is the datacenter is in Manhattan and provides secure unescorted access. I could personally be there to fix, install, or upgrade stuff from my house within an hour. Of course if we are thinking beyond two years we can't just count on me, since who knows what I will be doing then, and of course on-site response can't be replaced in a lot of situations, but having an alternative to a $150/hour remote hands fee for most situations would be nice. NathanKennedy Another thing, I seriously think we should consider marketing dedicated servers or collocation ourselves. This would be another valuable service we could provide, which would make it much easier to fill larger cabinets and allow even our $5/mo. members to benefit from the best possible facilities. NathanKennedy
Line 16: Line 17:
http://www.he.net/
Line 17: Line 19:
[http://www.he.net/]

If we can stay under 1MB/s, the rate for bandwidth plus up to 7U is $300/month.  
If we can stay under 1MB/s, the rate for bandwidth plus up to 7U is $300/month.
Line 23: Line 23:
Their response to our request as a PDF: attachment:he_colo.pdf Their response to our request as a PDF: [[attachment:he_colo.pdf]]
Line 25: Line 25:
 HE looks great. I have heard great things about them, and this is definitely a good deal for what it is. I think they come a close second after Peer1 for quality. NathanKennedy

== InReach ==

[http://www.inreach.com/]

Didn't receive reply to first email sent on 4/8/2006 to sales@inreach.com, sent second email on 4/17/2006 with our form quote request.

Update: email to sales@inreach.com could not be sent for more than 4 hours, seems like an internal error on inreach's network. Since these signs don't bode well for future service, I will put them on the inactive list unless I receive a compelling quote in the next few days.

== Peer 1 ==

[http://www.peer1.net]

Peer 1 offers a quarter cabinet for 10U. A fast ethernet port with a 5MB/s connection is provided. Monthly costs for the space will be $750, and there would be a $400 initial charge for installation of a rack/cabinet.

Peer 1 does not sell hardware.

Their response to our request as a PDF: attachment:Peer1.QuarterCab.Proposal.pdf

 It looks pretty clear that Peer1 is by far the highest quality provider on our list, and I was impressed by their letter and quote. The bar to entry is also high; $750 a month and 10U to utilize. On the other hand it is tempting; PLENTY of room for growth probably for years to come, a first-class network (450 direct tier one peers, 1-ms maximum intercity latency, 4-ms maximum intercity latency delivery to any tier one peer). We would NOT be having the kind of network issues we were plagued with in the past with Interserver. It is definitely a good value, but it an awfully big step up from where we are now--we don't want to waste member resources if the cabinet went vastly underutilized for long periods of time; we would need a major membership drive or some really big clients. Another advantage is the datacenter is in Manhattan and provides secure unescorted access. I could personally be there to fix, install, or upgrade shit from my house within an hour. Of course if we are thinking beyond two years we can't just count on me, since who knows what I will be doing then, and of course on-site response can't be replaced in a lot of situations, but having an alternative to a $150/hour remote hands fee for most situations would be nice. NathanKennedy
 Another thing, I seriously think we should consider marketing dedicated servers or collocation ourselves. This would be another valuable service we could provide, which would make it much easier to fill larger cabinets and allow even our $5/mo. members to benefit from the best possible facilities. NathanKennedy
 . HE looks great. I have heard great things about them, and this is definitely a good deal for what it is. I think they come a close second after Peer1 for quality. NathanKennedy
 . .
 . I ran my Artelope web site off a basic user account on HE for 5 or 6 years. I was always satisfied with their service, both in terms of uptime and in terms of helping me out with a human being when I had a problem. I closed my account and came here because I felt their price was too much to pay for a small site like mine. JoshGoldfoot
Line 49: Line 30:
http://www.switchanddata.com/
Line 50: Line 32:
[http://www.switchanddata.com/]

Switch and Data is carrier-neutral, meaning that they would give us space, and we would buy bandwidth from another provider (or multiple providers, eventually).  I got quotes for three locations that Switch and Data has in NYC.
Switch and Data is carrier-neutral, meaning that they would give us space, and we would buy bandwidth from another provider (or multiple providers, eventually). I got quotes for three locations that Switch and Data has in NYC. The reason that the 65 Broadway location is slightly less expensive than the other two locations is because it has connections to fewer providers available compared to the other locations in NYC. If we can live with the providers
Line 56: Line 36:
Includes:  (1) Half Locking Cabinet/Open Face Rack, 10 AMPS AC Power, (1) Cross Connect (Media Agnostic) Includes: (1) Half Locking Cabinet/Open Face Rack, 10 AMPS AC Power, (1) Cross Connect (Media Agnostic)
Line 58: Line 38:
65 Broadway:  $625.00 Monthly Recurring Cost 65 Broadway: $625.00 Monthly Recurring Cost
Line 60: Line 40:
111 8th & 60 Hudson St:  $775.00 Monthly Recurring Cost 111 8th & 60 Hudson St: $775.00 Monthly Recurring Cost
Line 62: Line 42:
The Switch and Data representative also gave me site specifications for their three locations: The Switch and Data representative also gave me site specifications for their three locations in NYC.
Line 64: Line 44:
 * [[attachment:Site_Spec_NYC_111_8th_.pdf]]
 * [[attachment:Site_Spec_NYC_60_Hudson_8.01.05.pdf]]
 * [[attachment:Site_Spec_NYC_65_Broadway_4.22.05.pdf]]
== Simpli ==
Justin had disqualified Simpli before, but I was surprised at their nonresponsiveness, because I'd had some nice e-mail conversations with the founder in the past. So, I e-mailed her asking what was up and she got back to us in a few days. She said that she hadn't replied before because Simpli is currently figuring out the details of expanding into some new hosting space and that made some pricing issues uncertain. I don't think it was acceptable to give us no reply because of this, but I at least have reason to believe that these are good people at Simpli and that we should consider them, given their much lower rates for colocation at our current modest needs. --AdamChlipala
Line 65: Line 50:
I think that any provider which does not respond in a timely manner should be removed from consideration, without exception. This was a warning sign with InterServer that we failed to heed. --MichaelOlson
Line 66: Line 52:
They would provide the hardware with 1-year parts and labor warranties:
Line 67: Line 54:
{{{
Web server (each): $964.60 (includes 3Ware 2-port Serial ATA hardware RAID
card; subtract $150 if you would prefer software RAID)
- Uses 2x80GB Western Digital SATA drives.
Line 68: Line 59:
== Simpli == Database server: $2700 with 500GB drives
$2180 with 400GB drives
(includes 3Ware 4-port Serial ATA hardware RAID card; subtract $380 if you
would prefer software RAID)
Line 70: Line 64:
[http://www.simpli.biz/] Both configurations are 1U. Each server comes with a 1-year parts and labor
warranty. After the year, we can replace parts for the part cost + labor
(which is $100/hour) or you can buy the parts yourself through us or through
any vendor and replace it yourself by scheduling a datacenter visit.
Line 72: Line 69:
Didn't receive reply to first email sent on 4/8/2006 to sales@simpli.biz, sent second email on 4/17/2006 with our form quote request. Your total colocation price would be $70/month for 2U of space (assuming 2
servers) plus whatever bandwidth costs you would have.

Serial console service is $20/month per server. We don't currently have an
offsite backup service such as the one you are looking for, but we will in
the next 2-3 months as we open a second location.
}}}
This leaves out some details of bandwidth pricing, which can be found at http://www.simpli.biz/colocation.php.

1. Evaluation of Potential Colocation Providers

Below are the service providers that Hcoop, Inc. is considering for our future hosting needs, along with available information about pricing and infrastructure. Some providers that are no longer being considered for our hosting needs are listed at the page PreviouslyConsideredColocationProviders.

1.1. Peer 1

http://www.peer1.net

Peer 1 offers a quarter cabinet for 10U. A fast ethernet port with a 5MB/s connection is provided. Monthly costs for the space will be $750, and there would be a $400 initial charge for installation of a rack/cabinet. A 10 amp circuit is provided.

Peer 1 does not sell hardware.

Their response to our request as a PDF: Peer1.QuarterCab.Proposal.pdf

  • It looks pretty clear that Peer1 is by far the highest quality provider on our list, and I was impressed by their letter and quote. The bar to entry is also high; $750 a month and 10U to utilize. On the other hand it is tempting; PLENTY of room for growth probably for years to come, a first-class network (450 direct tier one peers, 1-ms maximum intercity latency, 4-ms maximum intercity latency delivery to any tier one peer). We would NOT be having the kind of network issues we were plagued with in the past with Interserver. It is definitely a good value, but it an awfully big step up from where we are now--we don't want to waste member resources if the cabinet went vastly underutilized for long periods of time; we would need a major membership drive or some really big clients. Another advantage is the datacenter is in Manhattan and provides secure unescorted access. I could personally be there to fix, install, or upgrade stuff from my house within an hour. Of course if we are thinking beyond two years we can't just count on me, since who knows what I will be doing then, and of course on-site response can't be replaced in a lot of situations, but having an alternative to a $150/hour remote hands fee for most situations would be nice. NathanKennedy Another thing, I seriously think we should consider marketing dedicated servers or collocation ourselves. This would be another valuable service we could provide, which would make it much easier to fill larger cabinets and allow even our $5/mo. members to benefit from the best possible facilities. NathanKennedy

1.2. He.net

http://www.he.net/

If we can stay under 1MB/s, the rate for bandwidth plus up to 7U is $300/month.

He.net does not sell hardware.

Their response to our request as a PDF: he_colo.pdf

  • HE looks great. I have heard great things about them, and this is definitely a good deal for what it is. I think they come a close second after Peer1 for quality. NathanKennedy

  • .
  • I ran my Artelope web site off a basic user account on HE for 5 or 6 years. I was always satisfied with their service, both in terms of uptime and in terms of helping me out with a human being when I had a problem. I closed my account and came here because I felt their price was too much to pay for a small site like mine. JoshGoldfoot

1.3. Switch and Data

http://www.switchanddata.com/

Switch and Data is carrier-neutral, meaning that they would give us space, and we would buy bandwidth from another provider (or multiple providers, eventually). I got quotes for three locations that Switch and Data has in NYC. The reason that the 65 Broadway location is slightly less expensive than the other two locations is because it has connections to fewer providers available compared to the other locations in NYC. If we can live with the providers

Bundled Half Cabinet:

Includes: (1) Half Locking Cabinet/Open Face Rack, 10 AMPS AC Power, (1) Cross Connect (Media Agnostic)

65 Broadway: $625.00 Monthly Recurring Cost

111 8th & 60 Hudson St: $775.00 Monthly Recurring Cost

The Switch and Data representative also gave me site specifications for their three locations in NYC.

1.4. Simpli

Justin had disqualified Simpli before, but I was surprised at their nonresponsiveness, because I'd had some nice e-mail conversations with the founder in the past. So, I e-mailed her asking what was up and she got back to us in a few days. She said that she hadn't replied before because Simpli is currently figuring out the details of expanding into some new hosting space and that made some pricing issues uncertain. I don't think it was acceptable to give us no reply because of this, but I at least have reason to believe that these are good people at Simpli and that we should consider them, given their much lower rates for colocation at our current modest needs. --AdamChlipala

I think that any provider which does not respond in a timely manner should be removed from consideration, without exception. This was a warning sign with InterServer that we failed to heed. --MichaelOlson

They would provide the hardware with 1-year parts and labor warranties:

Web server (each): $964.60 (includes 3Ware 2-port Serial ATA hardware RAID
card; subtract $150 if you would prefer software RAID)
- Uses 2x80GB Western Digital SATA drives.

Database server: $2700 with 500GB drives
$2180 with 400GB drives
(includes 3Ware 4-port Serial ATA hardware RAID card; subtract $380 if you
would prefer software RAID)

Both configurations are 1U. Each server comes with a 1-year parts and labor
warranty. After the year, we can replace parts for the part cost + labor
(which is $100/hour) or you can buy the parts yourself through us or through
any vendor and replace it yourself by scheduling a datacenter visit.

Your total colocation price would be $70/month for 2U of space (assuming 2
servers) plus whatever bandwidth costs you would have.

Serial console service is $20/month per server. We don't currently have an
offsite backup service such as the one you are looking for, but we will in
the next 2-3 months as we open a second location.

This leaves out some details of bandwidth pricing, which can be found at http://www.simpli.biz/colocation.php.

OurHistory/ColocationProvidersEvaluation (last edited 2008-07-07 04:27:59 by localhost)