welcome: please sign in

Diff for "OurHistory/ColocationProvidersEvaluation"

Differences between revisions 26 and 27
Revision 26 as of 2006-04-22 13:09:08
Size: 3938
Comment: removed inreach
Revision 27 as of 2006-04-22 13:09:43
Size: 3757
Comment: removed simpli
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 51: Line 51:

== Simpli ==

[http://www.simpli.biz/]

Didn't receive reply to first email sent on 4/8/2006 to sales@simpli.biz, sent second email on 4/17/2006 with our form quote request.

1. Evaluation of Potential Colocation Providers

Below are the service providers that Hcoop, Inc. is considering for our future hosting needs, along with available information about pricing and infrastructure. Some providers that are no longer being considered for our hosting needs are listed at the page PreviouslyConsideredColocationProviders.

1.1. He.net

[http://www.he.net/]

If we can stay under 1MB/s, the rate for bandwidth plus up to 7U is $300/month.

He.net does not sell hardware.

Their response to our request as a PDF: attachment:he_colo.pdf

  • HE looks great. I have heard great things about them, and this is definitely a good deal for what it is. I think they come a close second after Peer1 for quality. NathanKennedy

1.2. Peer 1

[http://www.peer1.net]

Peer 1 offers a quarter cabinet for 10U. A fast ethernet port with a 5MB/s connection is provided. Monthly costs for the space will be $750, and there would be a $400 initial charge for installation of a rack/cabinet.

Peer 1 does not sell hardware.

Their response to our request as a PDF: attachment:Peer1.QuarterCab.Proposal.pdf

  • It looks pretty clear that Peer1 is by far the highest quality provider on our list, and I was impressed by their letter and quote. The bar to entry is also high; $750 a month and 10U to utilize. On the other hand it is tempting; PLENTY of room for growth probably for years to come, a first-class network (450 direct tier one peers, 1-ms maximum intercity latency, 4-ms maximum intercity latency delivery to any tier one peer). We would NOT be having the kind of network issues we were plagued with in the past with Interserver. It is definitely a good value, but it an awfully big step up from where we are now--we don't want to waste member resources if the cabinet went vastly underutilized for long periods of time; we would need a major membership drive or some really big clients. Another advantage is the datacenter is in Manhattan and provides secure unescorted access. I could personally be there to fix, install, or upgrade shit from my house within an hour. Of course if we are thinking beyond two years we can't just count on me, since who knows what I will be doing then, and of course on-site response can't be replaced in a lot of situations, but having an alternative to a $150/hour remote hands fee for most situations would be nice. NathanKennedy Another thing, I seriously think we should consider marketing dedicated servers or collocation ourselves. This would be another valuable service we could provide, which would make it much easier to fill larger cabinets and allow even our $5/mo. members to benefit from the best possible facilities. NathanKennedy

1.3. Switch and Data

[http://www.switchanddata.com/]

Switch and Data is carrier-neutral, meaning that they would give us space, and we would buy bandwidth from another provider (or multiple providers, eventually). I got quotes for three locations that Switch and Data has in NYC. The reason that the 65 Broadway location is slightly less expensive than the other two locations is because it has connections to fewer providers available compared to the other locations in NYC. If we can live with the providers

Bundled Half Cabinet:

Includes: (1) Half Locking Cabinet/Open Face Rack, 10 AMPS AC Power, (1) Cross Connect (Media Agnostic)

65 Broadway: $625.00 Monthly Recurring Cost

111 8th & 60 Hudson St: $775.00 Monthly Recurring Cost

The Switch and Data representative also gave me site specifications for their three locations in NYC.

  • attachment:Site_Spec_NYC_111_8th_.pdf
  • attachment:Site_Spec_NYC_60_Hudson_8.01.05.pdf
  • attachment:Site_Spec_NYC_65_Broadway_4.22.05.pdf

OurHistory/ColocationProvidersEvaluation (last edited 2008-07-07 04:27:59 by localhost)