⇤ ← Revision 1 as of 2007-10-21 14:43:50
Size: 165
Comment:
|
Size: 676
Comment: some items of interest, better agenda structure.
|
Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
Line 2: | Line 2: |
== Reports == * Treasurer * Secretary * System Administrators * Status of required Daemons / Services (such as Mailman) / etc. * Blockers |
|
Line 3: | Line 9: |
== Business Items == | |
Line 4: | Line 11: |
* Whether or not HCoop should appoint a day-to-day volunteer operations manager, and what duties he might be charged with. * Whether or not a tiered sysadmin structure would be appropriate to reduce simple administrative workloads on primary system administrators. * Migration timeline * Clarify when to allow new members to join |
1. Agenda Suggestions
1.1. Reports
- Treasurer
- Secretary
- System Administrators
- Status of required Daemons / Services (such as Mailman) / etc.
- Blockers
1.2. Business Items
- Do we need to make the new-user-creation-from-fyodor process simpler to avoid losing members (and their payment of negative balances)?
- Whether or not HCoop should appoint a day-to-day volunteer operations manager, and what duties he might be charged with.
- Whether or not a tiered sysadmin structure would be appropriate to reduce simple administrative workloads on primary system administrators.
- Migration timeline
- Clarify when to allow new members to join