Differences between revisions 1 and 3 (spanning 2 versions)

1. Agenda Suggestions

1.1. Reports

President / Treasurer
Secretary
System Administrators
- Status of required daemons / services (such as Mailman) / etc.
- Blockers
Announcements and public comments

Do we need to make the new-user-creation-from-fyodor process simpler to avoid losing members (and their payment of negative balances)?
Whether or not HCoop should appoint a day-to-day volunteer operations manager, and what duties he might be charged with.
Whether or not a tiered sysadmin structure would be appropriate to reduce simple administrative workloads on primary system administrators.
Migration timeline
Clarify when to allow new members to join

-  ⇤ ← Revision 1 as of 2007-10-21 14:43:50 → 
  Size: 165
  Editor: AdamChlipala
  Comment:
+   ← Revision 3 as of 2007-10-21 16:15:04 → ⇥
  Size: 726
  Editor: RyanMikulovsky
  Comment:
-Deletions are marked like this.
+Additions are marked like this.
 Line 2:
+== Reports ==
 * President / Treasurer
 * Secretary
 * System Administrators
  * Status of required daemons / services (such as Mailman) / etc.
  * Blockers
 * Announcements and public comments
-Line 3:
+Line 10:
+== Business Items ==
-Line 4:
+Line 12:
+ * Whether or not HCoop should appoint a day-to-day volunteer operations manager, and what duties he might be charged with.
 * Whether or not a tiered sysadmin structure would be appropriate to reduce simple administrative workloads on primary system administrators.
 * Migration timeline
 * Clarify when to allow new members to join